Peace of islam: what if tomorrow…?

But why would anyone wish all of the people of these lands any harm?

I agree. I do not know why they wish us harm, but since they do - what is the harm in harming them, and ending it all at once?

P.S. Please vote

We are all connected one way or another on this planet. A global economy is already well upon us and even Yemen participates.

Yeah, can see air freight is getting big over there. Question is - is it worth it?

Humans live there.

Humans have successfully infested the entire planet, and some humans are nicer than others. What is your point?

Pretty much every country breeds terrorism, including our own.

Really? What was the name of the last Polish terrorist you know? Or one from Tibet? And how do we in the US breed international terrorism?

Because the world doesn't revolve around "us?"

It does not, but we can make it.

What about the Yemenis?

How did you put it in the next line? Who gives a @!$%#?

What if you woke up tomorrow and there was no Nebraska? Would your life change?

Yeah, it would. We could finally clear the world of the muslim terrorists and their open and silent supporters, including but not limited to the Yemen.

In the mean time please tell me when was the last time a Nebraskan sent an explosive package to Sana'a, and how many international terrorist camps are there in Nebraska?

I know some Yemenis, and unlike you, they're not advocating killing anyone.

Really? And what have they done to stop those other from killing me? Nothing (as I strongly suspect) is not good enough.

I'm done here. Have your genocidal fantasy without me.

I will and it is a good one, much better than all those poor virgins in the after-life.

And what has a single Yemenis done to kill you? Nothing

Beware of Yemenians bearing gifts, or shipping them airmail, as the case might be. Personally I think it is a bit more than nothing. The explosive gifts, the training camps - that is a lot more than nothing.

I know this, because you're still alive to write this nonsense.

And I intend to stay that way long after Yemen is but a distant memory, preferably with all of Dar-Al-Islam.

I don't see that a single Yemeni has done anything to destroy you.

Those who are not blind - can see. As for the Christmas bomber he was from Niger. But respecting your question - what have they done for me lately?

And how many of these explosive "gifts" have you personally received? Or for that matter, how many of them were addressed to you specifically? That's my point. Yemenis are not out to get you. They're out to get rid of political figures, which is definitely wrong. But your desire to kill them because they mailed a bomb to someone else is a bit odd.

A very interesting and very perverted logic. So when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor it was not an attack on me personally, and I should not hold it against Japan, right? Or let's say because I do not leave in N.Y. City and do not have a direct relative who died in the Towers I should not consider it an act of war. It was not directed at me personally. I've got news for you, whomever you are, these gifts were an attack on my countrymen, on my country and on my way of life. You may find my desires to kill those who mail bombs to my country, and those who harbor them, and those who silently approve a bit odd. I find those desire very natural, and what I find odd is your perverted logic of putting your own personality "uber alles" and thus justifying your indifference and inaction.

Perhaps, since you are so intent on their death, maybe mail yourself in a package armed with whatever weapons you want. Then you get to satisfy your desire that a) Yemenis die, and b) that you contributed to the effort.

I do not believe in terrorism, I do believe however in decisive action and MAXIMUM response. I do not want some random Yemeni family dead. I want Yemen no more, that will solve a lot of problem, and save a lot of people's lives. People on my side of this war, which means theirs are the only lives that matter.

Yep. But trained in Yemen.

Good, one more reason not to have a Yemen.

If you're going to call for the death of an entire country's population, you might as well know the facts "supporting" your hatred...

It is not "hatred" it is a rational and well-measured proposal. I do hate islam, because it poisons brains of innocent people with all my heart, but harbor no ill will towards any particular country or its people. You're confusing solutions with feelings - you must a liberal.

That is correct, more or less.

I have no reason to continue this conversation, and request that you do the same. Thank you for playing, but based on this answer it appears that the only thing we can agree on is to continue to vehemently disagree about things that most people find elementary.

No, my friend, I am not of the philosophy that suide bombing is a good idea, I'd rather just drop the bomb and live happily ever after.

They have to kill themselves because:

1. They are to dumb to come up with a better idea
2. They think their after life will better than this one

I have neither the intellectual limitation nor the misguided hope, so no - I intend to live.

I am not your friend. You are philosophically bankrupt.

So I conclude you've seen my phylosophical bank account? Or a bad philosophical check I wrote?

They don't have to kill themselves .

Actually they do have to kill themselves, the more and faster the better, it is the innocent that they take with them that I am concerned with.

They don't have to kill themselves . Not that I agree with theim unlike cowards like you, they live and die by their priciles

How do you figure I am a coward? Because my principals tell me to kill the enemy, live to see the vicrory, and then continue living long after that? Or is it because my civilization has managed to develop superior means of killing the enemy? Which one of them is unpricipled cowardice?

You are misguided and your limitations are not restricted to your intellect, such as it is.

Of course I am - I like me, and they don't. Hmm, but they like them, and I don't. I am confused what is the difference?

| so no -I intend to live.

Too bad

Coming from person who criticizes me for wanting to kill other "humans" this is a very interesting comment. One almost has to wonder about your own honesty, and your own relationship to the muslim community? Are you a Buddhist monk who defends the principle of Ahimsa?

Yea, you;ve exposed your account and arrogance pretty clearly.

I was never hiding my arrogance.

Simply... you only talk the talk.

Ahhh. Would you prefer I actually killed a few muslims? Than I would be much more deserving of your respect?

Than I reflected on you willingness to kill other "humans", but only by proxy.

Meaning what? You recognize only hand-to-hand combat, or do knifes count too? Why would spend countless millenia to develop our military technology, just so a moron such yourself can call civilized people cowards?

Don't think you'd have the balls to do it yourself.

Come and lick them.

While I don't wish you any harm, I woudn;t miss you.

Of course you would - people like you can't even shoot straight.

I figured you'd try to spin it a bit. You failed

Did I? Did I really? Btw I'd like you to answer the question.

I am not so inclined. Besides, you'll have to grow pair. I must admit it's an original way to out yourself.

One more time - to estimate the presence and the dimensions of my balls you have to get it in person, and since according to you I am the coward, I do not get what seems to be the problem?

Should someone eradicate the USA now because Timothy McVeigh bombed the Murrah building? And people have bombed abortion clinics and sent mail bombs to professors, and so on? All of those were white, male, American terrorists.

As stupid and Tim was, it was domestic. No one is immune from homegrown morons. But that is one thing - having explosive goods shipped from overseas, and having offer the land and protection for people who want to kill us - is quite another. While I think that domestic terrorists should be dealt with swiftly and harshly - I expect my government to deal with those who would wage war on us even more decisively. In other, simpler, kinder, dumber, and perhaps more comprehensible to you words - Timothy McVeigh is very bad, and we have to deal with his kind, but while we are at it - I do not wish to be distracted by some moron brainwashed by islam, so I just want to clear the way.

Yes, I love you too. But in all fairness I would reserve the title for the islamic terrorists. But than again perhaps wanting to convert or kill us all, and to destroy our way of life is Ok with you, and wanting to defend our way of life from those who attacked us first is a much more horrible thing to do. But in either case I highly appreciate your enlightened opinion.

The fact that I am neither enticing the action, nor advocating it, but rather attempting to gauge public opinion about a hypothetical scenario. Pentagon has military plans for all kinds of contingencies, it is their jobs, and no one calls the planning arm of our military a terrorist organization. Well no one, except for the terrorists themselves and their liberal sympathisers.

Thank you, LordFluffy, I fixed it.

Read #4.11 - he has the same voting rights and leaves in the same country we do. I believe it was him and his friends who elected our fearless leader, who is only capable of issuing ultimatums to the loyal political opposition.